Pregnancy Photographer, Maternity, Newborn Baby and Child Photography in and around San Diego and Orange County

Whats in my camera bag? - Ashley McNamara - San Diego Photographer


 

Most Frequently Asked Questions: “What camera do you have?” and “How many lenses do you own?”

As a primary camera body I’m using a Canon 40D and can I just say that I love it. Awesome colors and clarity every time, it’s great! One of the reasons its my most used camera body is due purely to ISO performance. Lets face it, sometimes the light just isn’t there and you have to bump that sucker up to ISO 1600 and my 40D handles like a champ!  As a backup I have a Canon 30D, it’s another great canon product and one that I highly recommend any new photographer invest in. (But with the XSI coming out, I might be changing that recommendation)

As for lenses, my first lens purchase was the 50mm 1.8. Compared to my kit lens, I was in heaven. Pictures were just so much clearer and it really forced me to think about my composition. I haven’t found myself using it quite as much these days, but I keep it in my arsenal. The wallet friendly price tag makes it another newbie must have.

The next lens was the 24-70 2.8 L . After almost 3 years it is STILL my favorite lens. I use it on almost every shoot. Its a super versitile portrait lens.

After that I bought the 70-200 2.8 L and to be quite frank, it’s rarely used. I’m still trying to fall in love with it, but the opportunity to use it properly rarely presents itself. To be used on my  40D (which is not full frame)  I have to be like a million miles away from my subject and as a portrait photographer I rarely need to be more than a few feet away from the subject. Having said that however, I have quite a few friends who swear by this lens and say that is works just as well for shooting toddlers.

The Novelty purchase came next: The 15mm Fisheye. I held out on this one because I had gotten mixed reviews.It wasn’t something I “needed” per se, but I’d always wanted it.  One day the bug got me and I bit the bullet and bought it. Now that I have it, I’m not sure how I lived without it!  It is sooooo much fun! It went from being a novelty purchase to a staple in my camera bag. I use it on almost all of my shoots. Not being full frame works to my advantage. I can take family pictures (like this) and it doesn’t have a really distorted look to it.

15mm fisheye example

Last, but certainly not least, came the 50mm 1.4. This wasn’t actually purchased as much as it was traded for a Jill-e bag from my friend Marmalade. And let me just tell you it was one of the BEST trades ever! I’d been on the fence about getting this lens, Kept telling myself that I already had the 1.8, why do I need the 1.4? HA! Oh, how simple minded of me. LOL Seriously, guys this is like a whole different lens. Its like butta.. ;) Love it!

As for my camera bag, I carry everything in my Crumpler 7 Million dollar home and yes…everything fits. :) It took quite a bit of trial and error finding the bag that worked best for me. I’ve been through many  (tamarac backpack, a shootsac, a Jill-e bag, etc)and my Crumpler is still the only one I find myself using.

6 Comments

  1. Marmalade said . . .

    ok, well, your blog looks AMAZING. can i trade you something to come sift through my code (ok, that sounded dirty). but fo’shizzle….the blog is awesome.

    and you are so right, after i eschewed the 20d in favor of my trusty 5d my fisheye lost its’ sort of usability. i’m currently in the market for a nikon wide wide angle for fun…i’m not sure if i’ll bite the bullet. LOVE that pic of the family.

    sorry, i should quit bloggin on your blog. xoxo

    Posted April 18, 2008 at 9:56 pm | Permalink
  2. BBB))) said . . .

    Nothing against the 70-200 2.8 at all but you may get more use out of the Canon 135 f/2.0 L or 85 f/1.2 lenses (to name just a few), especially with your predilection for primes!

    The Canon 70-200 f/4 or Sigma 50-150 f/2.8 might be slightly more wieldy, less imposing choices.

    Keep up the great work! :-)

    Posted April 19, 2008 at 12:09 am | Permalink
  3. Ashley McNamara said . . .

    Ben–The 135 f/2.0 is on my wishlist :) however I rented the 85mm f/1.2 for a couple of days and was just not feeling it. Some lenses just work/look better on a full frame camera and the 85 (for me) is one of them. Thanks!

    Posted April 19, 2008 at 6:06 am | Permalink
  4. Allie Hays said . . .

    Ive loved your work from the minute I saw it on Flickr. But thanks for sharing your love for your 40D. Ive had my 20D for 3 years now, and I think Im gonna buy me the 40D (nice lingo lol) since you love your so much! lol Hugs ~ Allie

    Posted April 19, 2008 at 11:03 am | Permalink
  5. Tom said . . .

    enjoyed the bit about the 70-200, I was just contemplating on getting one but not having a fullframe gives me the same weird feeling about being a zillion miles away. Maybe not portraits but for good candids on weddinds it might be good enough ..

    Posted April 21, 2008 at 10:51 pm | Permalink
  6. Amanda said . . .

    Hi sweety! What a great post! I also have the 24-70mm 2.8 and the 50mm 1.4. Love them! I also have the 28mm 1.8 and fell in love with it the first time I used it. I was on the fence about the 15mm fisheye, but after your nice review on it and THAT PHOTO…how could I not just go get it!!?? I LOOOOOVE that photo. If it was my family, that picture would be displayed HUGE on my living room! :) Let’s get together soon. Lunch?

    Posted April 27, 2008 at 7:58 am | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*
-->